NMT project review

13 02 2010

Our research findings were based on two websites. NAMS and The RWJF (The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation).

The main difference between the two sites was that one was a web 2.0 while the other one was not. The RWJF website was a web 2.0 hence the site gained more awareness compared to the NAMS website. Along the way to completing the project, I have learnt that a web 2.0 site gains get more attention as it is linked to other social media websites that involves any member of the public.

Frankly, I did not enjoy this subject as I did not understand what the subject was about. It was really dry and boring. But I still learnt a few new things about New Media Trends.

Advertisement

Actions

Information

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s




Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.